Employment/HR

Millennials key to worldwide cyber security workforce shortage, says new study

BY Fraser Tennant

A severe shortage of talent in the information security workforce is looming, with employers needing to look to millennials to fill the gap, according to new research from the Center for Cyber Safety and Education, published this week.

The research, part of the Centre’s eighth Global Information Security Workforce Study (GISWS), which includes feedback from over 19,000 information security professionals worldwide, indicates that employers must look to millennials to fill the projected 1.8 million information security workforce gap that is estimated to exist by 2022. This is a 20 percent rise from the 1.5 million worker shortfall forecast by the GISWS in 2015.

The publication of the GISWS coincides with a major initiative to tackle the UK skills deficit due to a lack of millennials recruited into the field: the National Cyber Security Centre, which was officially opened this week in London.

"Supporting and developing the next generation of cyber security talent is essential to the future of the industry,” said Richard Horne, cyber security partner at PwC. “We are on track to recruit more than 1000 technology specialists over the next four years at both graduate and experienced levels. It is important to help graduates experience the many different paths a career in this field could follow by offering a rotation programme around our teams, ranging from threat intelligence and incident detection and response to security transformation programmes and legal and regulatory compliance.”

The 2017 GISWS features a series of reports and analyses focusing on millennial respondents, with key takeaways for employers and hiring managers as to how they should go about attracting and retaining the millennial workforce. These include: (i) millennials value career development opportunities and are more likely to pay for them, if not offered by their employers; (ii) they are more likely to aspire to become security consultants than move into managerial roles within an organisation; and (iii) salaries were not the highest priority for millennials, but they do receive higher salary increases than other generations.

Mr Horne continued: “Cyber security roles can often be seen as purely technical but today's well-rounded cyber security expert has a diverse skillset, with not only technical knowledge but also wider business skills like creativity, organisation, relationship-building and communication."

With addressing the impending information security workforce shortage clearly a major concern, David Shearer, chief executive of the Center for Cyber Safety and Education, is confident that millennials “are the future of cyber security and hold the key to filling the information security workforce gap".

Report: Meet the Millennials – the Next Generation of your Information Security Workforce

Executive pay crackdown announced by May

BY Fraser Tennant

Tighter controls on executive pay designed to curb the excesses of the “privileged few” have been proposed by UK prime minister Theresa May this week as part of an anti-elitism drive to regulate company behaviour and create a more equal country.

The proposals contained in the ‘Corporate Governance Reform’ Green paper are part of Ms May’s attempt to restore public trust in business practices and close the gap between those at either end of the corporate ladder (an increase in inequality being one of the main reasons for Brexit).  

In a statement outlining its intent, the UK government stated that it would bring to an end the behaviour of "an irresponsible minority of privately-held companies acting carelessly – which left employees, customers and pension fund beneficiaries to suffer when things go wrong".

Ms May’s drive to tackle unsavoury corporate behaviour focuses on five specific areas: shareholder voting and other rights; shareholder engagement on pay; the role of remuneration committees; pay disclosure; and long-term pay incentives. One of the main components of the prime minister’s plans is the question of whether a new pay ratio requirement should be introduced.

However, a proposal to have workers represented on company boards has already been sidelined. Business minister Greg Clark indicating that the government was unlikely to change the unitary boards system currently in place.

Providing a stark illustration of the disparity between pay in the boardroom as opposed to the shop floor, is a TUC study (September 2016) which found that, in 2015, the average FTSE 100 boss earned 123 times the average full-time salary. Furthermore, the median total pay (excluding pensions) of top FTSE 100 directors increased by 47 percent between 2010 and 2015, to £3.4m. In contrast, the average wages for workers were found to have risen by only 7 percent over the same period.

The TUC research also found that those companies with high pay inequality between bosses and workers tended to perform less well overall.

“Two thirds of people think executive pay is too high, so we support the Government’s intent to help rebuild trust and strengthen accountability in this area,” said Fiona Camenzuli, a partner in PwC’s Reward & Employment team. “Enhanced shareholder powers and engagement, greater focus by boards on pay fairness, appropriate employee and stakeholder voice in the boardroom, and making pay plans simpler and longer term can all contribute to making pay work better to support the long-term performance of UK companies. The Green Paper presents a wide range of sensible options and we encourage a robust debate, based on evidence, to determine the right policy proposals.”

Following consultations on the Green Paper, a White paper is expected in early 2017. “It will be a consultation that will deliver results,” said Ms May.

News: ‘Corporate Governance Reform’ Green paper

Global jaunts not giving businesses value for money, claims PwC

BY Fraser Tennant

Businesses investing millions sending their employees on assignments across the globe may not be getting value for money, according to a new Modern Mobility report by PwC.

The report, which draws on a survey of 200 global executives, states that six in 10 organisations believe that their global mobility programs do not represent a worthwhile return on investment.

Additionally, PwC predicts that the number of people undertaking global assignments will jump 50 percent by 2020, despite only a paltry 8 percent of global organisations currently being able to accurately calculate the cost of their mobility programs.

Clare Hughes, a director in PwC’s global mobility team, said “It’s not surprising that organisations are expecting a jump in the number of people that are globally mobile – it is a great way for businesses to fill skills gaps, enter high growth markets, attract employees and develop their people. For some businesses, international experience is now a must-have for anyone taking on a leadership position.”

The PwC report also warns that HR teams across the globe are being forced to operate with meagre resources, lacking the investment and infrastructure information they require to tackle the evolving business landscape, as well as the know-how to effectively manage the increasing number of globally mobile employees.

Ms Hughes continued: “Organisations’ failure to measure the cost and value of their programmes will cost them dearly in the long run. Many businesses risk wasting considerable money sending the wrong people to the wrong places, overpaying for expats when local talent is available in-country or offering large financial packages when people are more motivated by the development opportunity.

“Businesses need to have a clear global mobility strategy which is based on growth priorities and what skills they are going to need and where, backed up by plans on how they are going to source, deploy, manage and motivate employees who work internationally.”

Providing extra food for thought, the PwC report, while noting that nine in 10 organisations say they are looking to increase the number of their globally mobile employees over the next two years, three in 10 admit they aren’t sure how many of their employees actually work overseas each year.

Report: Moving people with purpose – modern mobility survey 2014

Working in South Africa

Following abuse of previous corporate immigration rules in South Africa, the government has recently implemented a program of reform. However, despite the changes, the situation remains tense.

FW speaks with Angelika Yakovchuk at WerthSchröderInc Attorneys about developments in corporate immigration in South Africa.

10Questions: Corporate immigration in South Africa

©2001-2024 Financier Worldwide Ltd. All rights reserved. Any statements expressed on this website are understood to be general opinions and should not be relied upon as legal, financial or any other form of professional advice. Opinions expressed do not necessarily represent the views of the authors’ current or previous employers, or clients. The publisher, authors and authors' firms are not responsible for any loss third parties may suffer in connection with information or materials presented on this website, or use of any such information or materials by any third parties.