Never-Before-Examined – the top five focus areas to prepare for an SEC exam
August 2014 | EXPERT BRIEFING | FINANCE & INVESTMENT
Another day, another initiative from the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
In 2012 the Commission began its Presence Exam initiative among newly registered investment advisers (RIAs), with the aim of ensuring compliance with federal securities laws and the RIAs’ own company standards. Now, in 2014, the SEC has announced what it terms the Never-Before-Examined initiative.
As the name suggests, the Commission intends to examine a “significant percentage” of those RIAs that have never been examined, with a focus on those that have been registered with the SEC for three or more years. The initiative forms a part of the Office of Compliance Inspections’ (OCIE) National Examination Program (NEP). According to OCIE officials this “significant percentage” is in the range of 25 to 40 percent, over a two-year period.
This is no small portion, and means that at least a quarter of those RIAs never-before-examined can expect the SEC to come knocking. According to the SEC, examination will come in two different flavours: The first – the risk-assessment approach – is likely to be a high level review of the RIAs’ business activities, with the goal of improving the examiners’ understanding of the firm. The second – the focused review – will include a “comprehensive, risk-based” exam of one or more specific areas, and will be very similar to a Presence Exam. The areas in question – compliance programs, filings, marketing, portfolio management and safety of client assets – should not catch any RIA by surprise.
All never-before-examined RIAs registered for over three years should have received a letter from the SEC outlining the new initiative. It is important to note that this letter does not necessarily mean the recipient will be examined. With typical onsite inspection lasting between one and three days and a notice period often just two weeks or less, it is best to plan early and prioritise actions. There are five main areas advisers can tackle now ahead of a potential SEC audit:
Be prepared. First and foremost, identify the firm’s potential violations and compliance gaps now. Waiting until the SEC is on its way, or – worse still – uncovers the issue themselves, will make the resolution process considerably more difficult. Where possible, back test your firm’s adherence to your compliance policies and procedures to identify possible issues. Areas that can be easily tested include: email reviews (ensure that your firm has a culture of compliance); timely delivery of audited financials (are investors receiving the audited financial statements as required under the Custody rule?) and record-keeping reviews (are all required records under the Adviser Act being maintained? And are they easily accessible and in a format that can be provided to the SEC in a timely manner?).
Personal trading is another area that often receives much scrutiny by the SEC, and based on our experience is often in need of attention. Given that poor personal trading files can set a negative tone for an audit, this area should be critically reviewed on an ongoing basis to ensure all necessary reports, statements and pre-clearances are on file. As discussed below, it is important to note that violations that are uncovered should be documented for the compliance files as should the resolution to the violation.
While the SEC isn’t expecting to see zero violations, it will expect a firm to have adequate procedures in place to identify violations, document when violations do occur, resolve them quickly and take steps to prevent their recurrence. Start by meeting with relevant personnel to address the violation. Educating your employees is a critical step to preventing future violations (e.g., through annual compliance training). Most importantly, do not hide your violations. Create a log detailing each violation and its resolution, and use memos to files where appropriate to document further. Demonstrate that your firm can identify discrepancies and successfully work toward addressing these issues while creating safeguards for the future.
Perform a critical review of your firm’s policies and procedures. It is important that a firm follow the internal guidelines laid out in its manual and code of ethics, as failure to abide by internal policy (even a best business practice) will be noted as a deficiency. Customise your compliance manual to reflect your firm’s actual practices. The SEC has previously penalised firms for not following internal policy even if the violation in question was not a required rule by the SEC.
Critically review your firm’s marketing materials. As part of this review, firms should look out for misleading information, inconsistencies across marketing materials and a lack of back-up materials to substantiate claims. For example, a firm may be penalised if the materials discuss the performance of the entire portfolio but do not note that one investment represented a material portion of the whole return. In the past, the SEC has also looked for discrepancies between the information contained in marketing materials as compared to information posted to an adviser’s password-protected website or provided in a regulatory filing (e.g., Form PF). To prevent inconsistencies in marketing materials, firms should implement a formal review process across all materials, including ADV disclosures. Language must also be used carefully so that it is not misconstrued or promissory in nature. Often, qualifiers such as ‘generally’ and ‘seeks to’ can be used to help soften statements made.
Evaluate all conflicts. In addition to identifying violations, firms should also evaluate all conflicts ahead of time and work to create a process to identify actual and possible conflicts, such as incorporating the use of employee reporting forms for things such as gifts and outside interests. To take an example, in one firm the SEC uncovered several directorships for key portfolio personnel that had not been identified by the CCO. Just as important as identifying the conflicts is the manner in which they are addressed. Advisers need to be able to evidence to the SEC that they are properly mitigating conflicts (e.g., disclosing the conflict when necessary, reviewing gifts/business entertainment in connection with best execution reviews, etc.). The development and documentation of these processes should also be a key focus of the adviser’s Annual Review Memorandum.
Prepare internal audit prep files now. In addition to collecting documents, consider how your firm will be presented to the SEC when it is time for an examination. Everything from your firm’s background, prep interviews with key employees, and ownership to the enhancements made to the compliance program should have a role in your firm’s ‘story’.
Notice of an SEC examination can often send panic through an organisation, especially those that have no prior experience being examined. But taking preparatory steps such as those highlighted above should go a long way in easing your firm’s worry. It is always prudent for RIAs to regularly review their business practices against compliance requirements, regardless of the possibility of examination. The Never-Before-Examined initiative merely underlines this truism.
Jillian Timmermans and Amelia Stoj are vice presidents and partners at Cordium.
© Financier Worldwide
Jillian Timmermans and Amelia Stoj