Commercial bankruptcy filings surge

BY Richard Summerfield

Commercial bankruptcy filings in the US increased by 48 percent in May from earlier in the year, according to the American Bankruptcy Institute (ABI).

Chapter 11 filings rose 28 percent in May from April, the ABI said, citing data from Epiq Systems. May saw a number of notable filings, including major retail chains such as J.C. Penney and Neiman Marcus.

“Companies that tried to shore up their balance sheets at the beginning of the year represent the initial wave of Chapter 11s due to the economic crisis brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic,” said Amy Quackenboss, executive director of the ABI. “The CARES Act and other swift government measures have been successful in keeping consumers afloat during the crisis. As this relief runs its course, however, mounting financial challenges may result in more households and companies seeking the shelter of bankruptcy.”

May’s commercial Chapter 11 filings represented a 29 percent increase from the 562 filings in April 2020. Total commercial filings were up 12 percent over the April 2020 commercial filing total of 2293. Total bankruptcy filings in May represented a 4 percent increase over the 38,444 total filings recorded the previous month. Total non-commercial filings for May represented a 3 percent increase from the April 2020 non-commercial filing total of 36,151.

The average nationwide per capita bankruptcy filing rate in May was 1.98 (total filings per 1000 per population), a decrease from the 2.09 filing rate during the first four months of the year. Average total filings per day in May 2020 were 1998, a 36 percent decrease from the 3130 total daily filings in May 2019.

There were 39,969 total bankruptcy filings in May, down 42 percent from the 68,860 total filings in May 2019. Total consumer filings decreased 43 percent in May, as the 37,391 filings fell from the 65,302 consumer filings registered in May 2019.

News: May Commercial Chapter 11s Increase 48 Percent over Last Year, Total Filings Down 42 Percent

DOJ releases revised compliance guidance

BY Richard Summerfield

This week the US Department of Justice (DOJ) issued a series of revisions to its ‘Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs’ which clarifies the new factors prosecutors may consider in the areas of risk management, policies and procedures, training and communications, mergers and acquisitions, and more in their evaluation of corporate compliance programmes.

Since the department first released guidance on how it evaluates corporate compliance programmes in 2017, there have been several revisions. Though the latest version leaves much of the substance of earlier versions unchanged, the most recent updates are in keeping with the agency’s efforts to improve its policies and provide transparency.

“The revised guidance on the Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs reflects additions based on our own experience and important feedback from the business and compliance communities,” said Brian Benczkowski, assistant attorney general of the DOJ’s Criminal Division, in a statement. “Although much of the substance of the prior version remains unchanged, the updates we have made are in keeping with our continued efforts as prosecutors to improve our own policies and practices to ensure transparency and the effective and consistent enforcement of our laws”.

One of the most telling changes has been in the section of the guidance concerning compliance programme structure, in which new language has been added to reflect how the Criminal Division assesses a company’s risk profile and offers solutions to reduce its risks. The new language states prosecutors will make a “reasonable, individualised determination in each case that considers various factors including, but not limited to, the company’s size, industry, geographic footprint, regulatory landscape, and other factors, both internal and external to the company’s operations, that might impact its compliance program”.

There have also been notable revisions to the language requiring prosecutors to ask companies whether their compliance programme is “adequately resourced and empowered to function” effectively. In previous versions of the guidance, prosecutors were encouraged to ask if the compliance programme has been “implemented effectively”.

Furthermore, the revisions note that prosecutors will evaluate compliance programmes at the time a potential offence occurred and when a decision is made about bringing charges. This will enable them to track the steps taken by companies to prevent problems from reoccurring.

News: DOJ revises its Corporate Compliance Guidance

Shattered finances: glassmaker Libbey files for Chapter 11

BY Fraser Tennant    

In a bid to restructure its balance sheet following plunging demand for its products, glassware manufacturer Libbey and its US-based subsidiaries have filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy.

Like many retailers, Libbey – which operates manufacturing plants in the US, Mexico, China, Portugal and the Netherlands – has been hit especially hard by the outbreak of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and its crippling impact on global economies. The Chapter 11 process is expected to strengthen Libbey’s balance sheet and help it to navigate the effects of COVID-19.

Moreover, a number of Libbey's existing lenders have agreed to provide up to $160m in debtor-in-possession (DIP) financing, including a $100m revolving credit facility and a $60m term loan. Following court approval, Libbey expects this financing, together with cash flow from operations, to support the business during the court-supervised process.

"While we entered 2020 with positive momentum from our strong finish in 2019, the dramatic and prolonged impact of COVID-19 on the demand for our products and on our business is truly unprecedented in Libbey's more than 200-year history,” said Mike Bauer, chief executive of Libbey. “As a result, entering this process is a necessary step to address our liquidity, strengthen our balance sheet and better position Libbey for the future.”

Libbey is continuing to serve customers and end users globally throughout the Chapter 11 process, and will continue to evaluate the operating environment and make adjustments, as necessary, to adapt to the impact of COVID-19.

“We believe this process will help Libbey become an even stronger, more influential partner to our customers, vendors and end users, and ensure we continue to create the most rewarding experiences with our extensive line of high-quality glassware and other tabletop products."

One of the largest glass tableware manufacturers in the world, Libbey supplies tabletop products to retail, foodservice and business-to-business customers in over 100 countries. Libbey's international subsidiaries in Canada, China, Mexico, the Netherlands and Portugal are not included in the Chapter 11 proceedings and are operating in the normal course of business.

Mr Bauer concluded: “As we navigate the current environment, we remain focused on providing end users with products that are environmentally sustainable, beautiful and durable.”

News: Libbey Commences Chapter 11 Reorganization with $160 Million in Agreed Financing

Texas Capital and Independent Bank abort $5.5bn merger

BY Fraser Tennant

Citing the volatile economic conditions caused by coronavirus (COVID-19), Texas Capital Bancshares and Independent Bank Group have mutually agreed to terminate their $5.5bn merger agreement.

The termination was approved by both companies’ boards of directors after careful consideration of the significant impact of COVID-19 on global markets and on the companies’ ability to fully realise the benefits they expected to achieve through the merger.

“Due to the unprecedented impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, both companies’ boards of directors believe it is in the best interests of our employees, clients and all of our shareholders to focus on managing our business during this time,” said Larry Helm, chairman of Texas Capital Bancshares. “With the talent and depth of our team and strong organic growth model, Texas Capital Bank has built a resilient business with lasting client relationships and a record of value creation through changing market dynamics and economic pressures.”

Neither party will pay any termination fee as a result of the mutual decision to terminate the merger agreement.

“While both companies believed in the benefits of the proposed transaction, it would not be prudent to continue to pursue the combination and integration of our companies at this time,” said David R. Brooks, group chairman and chief executive of Independent Bank Group. “I am confident this is the right decision for our company and our customers, employees, shareholders and other stakeholders. This decision allows us to dedicate our focus and resources toward ensuring the strength of our business, serving the interests of our customers and protecting the health and safety of our employees during these unprecedented times.”

Coinciding with the termination of the merger, Texas Capital Bank president and chief executive Keith Cargill announced that he had stepped down from both roles with immediate effect.

Mr Helm concluded: “Our dedicated team, whose tireless efforts to enhance our clients’ experience and the communities where we operate, will continue to guide Texas Capital Bank’s purpose and success.”

News: Texas banks call off merger, citing coronavirus impact

Latam the latest airline to file for bankruptcy protection

BY Richard Summerfield

Latam Airlines Group SA, Latin America’s largest air carrier, has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in New York after the COVID-19 pandemic grounded flights across the region.

“Latam entered the COVID-19 pandemic as a healthy and profitable airline group, yet exceptional circumstances have led to a collapse in global demand and has not only brought aviation to a virtual standstill, but it has also changed the industry for the foreseeable future,” said Roberto Alvo, chief executive of Latam.

He continued: “We have implemented a series of difficult measures to mitigate the impact of this unprecedented industry disruption, but ultimately this path represents the best option to lay the right foundation for the future of our airline group. We are looking ahead to a post-COVID-19 future and are focused on transforming our group to adapt to a new and evolving way of flying, with the health and safety of our passengers and employees being paramount.”

The airline will continue to fly while it is in bankruptcy protection. Its affiliates in Argentina, Brazil and Paraguay were not included in the Chapter 11 filing, though affiliates in Chile, Peru, Colombia, Ecuador and the US were.

To help fund its continued operations throughout the bankruptcy period, the company has secured funding from a number of its major shareholders, including the Cueto and Amaro families and Qatar Airways. In total, the company has secured around $900m in debtor-in-possession (DIP) financing.

However, the company has given no indication whether its largest shareholder, Delta Air Lines, which holds 20 percent of the company, will help. The airline noted in its statement: “To the extent permitted by law, the group would welcome other shareholders interested in participating in this process to provide additional financing.” The airline also noted that it had about $1.3bn in cash on hand.

Latam has struggled since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. In mid-March, it cut 90 percent of its flights and by April was down to just five routes. Earlier this month, Latam confirmed that it would lay off 3 percent of its workforce, some 1400 employees.

Of course, the company is not the only airline to suffer. Fellow South American airline Avianca has already filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, while Virgin Australia entered voluntary administration last month.

News: Latam Air Files Chapter 11 Bankruptcy, Stymied by Lockdowns

©2001-2026 Financier Worldwide Ltd. All rights reserved. Any statements expressed on this website are understood to be general opinions and should not be relied upon as legal, financial or any other form of professional advice. Opinions expressed do not necessarily represent the views of the authors’ current or previous employers, or clients. The publisher, authors and authors' firms are not responsible for any loss third parties may suffer in connection with information or materials presented on this website, or use of any such information or materials by any third parties.